Expert Review: TaylorMade M3 & M4 Drivers


I had the opportunity to attend an informational session hosted by Brian Coffman (VP and GM of TaylorMade) and Todd Beach (Senior VP of Research & Development and Engineering), and gathered all the inside intel on Twist Face technology and the rest of the exciting tech featured in the new 2018 TaylorMade M Family.

Instead of continuing on the M1 and M2 product lines, TaylorMade felt there were enough advancements in engineering and design to warrant donning the models the M3 and the M4. The M3 lineup has a 460cc and 440cc driver, fairway wood, rescue and iron set.The M4 lineup offers a little more versatility featuring a standard and draw biased driver, a standard and pro fairway wood, rescue, combo iron set and full iron set.

M3 & M4 Driver Technology

What do you get when you take carbon fiber club head construction elements and combine it with a radical departure from traditional driver-face design? The TaylorMade 2018 M3 and M4 Drivers. While a lot of great innovations were unveiled at the seminar, the major takeaway (as you no doubt guessed) was the re-imagination of the driver club face through Twist Face Technology, and for TaylorMade, there’s no turning back.

The Bulger driver surpassed long-nose woods as the preferred club style around the 1880’s, and driver club faces have been designed with the same bulge and roll technique since. A bulge and roll club face creates gear effect. The simplest way to describe gear effect is that when the club face opens it produces draw spin and vice versa.

Engineers test clubs using robotic arms because in doing so they can control for the greatest variable in the entire swing, the player. No matter what happens in the takeaway and downswing robots can always return the club face to square at impact. The result is that since the club face always returns to square the gear effect brings shots hit by robot arms back to the target line without crossing over. Humans, however, are not so precise and do not return the club face square to the target at impact every single time they swing.

TaylorMade Twist Face diagram

TaylorMade said it’s time to re-envision the face and used big data to prove it. Their engineers were able to parse the data from hundreds of thousands of swings and determined that the most typical misses are low heel and high toe. On average, if a human hit a shot off the high-toe the most likely reason for that would be that the face has closed to the target and delofted. And, we all know where that one goes, snap hook! The opposite holds true for the low-heel, the face opened and the loft increased, high slice.

By twisting the low heel and high toe TaylorMade was able to alter the gear effect a driver with a traditional bulge and roll face produces and align human mishits with the robot swings, bringing the ball back to the target line, but not crossing over. (Be sure to check out our in-person interview our correspondent Justin Morrison did with Todd Beach for more great information on Twist Face technology)

Todd Beach, TaylorMade’s Senior VP of R&D and Engineering, has been with TaylorMade for over 20 years. He agreed to sit down with us to discuss the new M3 and M4 drivers and their revolutionary Twist Face technology.

Enter Twist Face. TaylorMade’s R&D discovered vastly different results from human swings compared to laboratory controlled robot swings using the standard bulge and roll club face. Robots can correct shots off the heel and toe producing a ball flight that brings the ball back to only a few yards off the target line. Humans, however, are not so consistent and tend to either snap-hook or push-slice shots off of the toe and heel respectively. After interpreting the data, TaylorMade decided to forego the standard bulge and roll club face and designed the all new Twist Face technology. Twist Face technology is engineered to correct for those inherent swing tendencies in real time.

Considering all of the hype surrounding Twist Face, the M3 and M4 drivers also feature a lot of other great technologies that may be flying under the radar in terms of their performance. A new speed pocket featuring the Hammerhead slot sits behind the face of both driver versions.

TaylorMade M3 and M4 Driver Hammerhead Slot

With all the focus on Twist Face technology, the unsung hero of the new TaylorMade M3 & M4 Drivers is Hammerhead Speed Pocket technology. In order to maximize ball speeds right up against the USGA/R&A legal limit TaylorMade engineered a pocket in the sole right behind the face, which they are calling Hammerhead technology. While similar to the Speed pocket of the M2 Driver, the new new Hammerhead technology is wider and deeper, creating a massive sweet spot to enhance ball speed and forgiveness across the entire face, and reinforcing the outer portions of the slot allowed TaylorMade to create a lighter, more flexible face.

Neither of the M1 drivers had a speed pocket because the weight track that ran from toe to heel sat directly behind the face. The M3 driver solved this issue by eliminating the T Track and replaced it with the new Y-Track weight system that now sits behind the new speed pocket. Both sliding weights are able to move anywhere along the tracks giving players even more versatility dialing in the driver to their preferred shot shape. And, all with the added forgiveness of the massive sweet spot created by the Hammerhead slot.

M3 Driver Technology

  • 460cc and 440cc Club Head Sizes

  • Twist Face Technology

  • Hammerhead Technology

  • Carbon Fiber Crown and Sole

  • Y-Track Weight System

TaylorMade M3 440cc Driver

TaylorMade M4 Driver

M4 Driver Technology

  • Standard & Draw Type Club Head Options

  • Twist Face Technology

  • Hammerhead Technology

  • Carbon Fiber Crown and Sole

  • Geocoustic Technology

  • Split Internal Weighting

M3 & M4 Driver Review

Who’s it for?

Both drivers are designed to work for all players, get out and test them both to see which one you like better. The M3 440cc driver will be favored by better players and the M4 D-Type driver will be favored by players who struggle to draw the ball and tend to lose shots away from them.

Final Thoughts

When I initially tested the TaylorMade M3 and M4 drivers I had some mixed results and feelings. There is a definite difference to how clubs set up at address from manufacturer to manufacturer. Historically, I have not hit TaylorMade clubs well, but after great results with the M3 and M4 hybrids and fairways I was excited to see how Twist Face would work for me.

At first it did not go well with the M3. Everything I have been testing over the past few months has produced a consistent slight draw, but with the M3 drivers I was tending to lose shots right. After a series of confusing and poor shots I decided I better pack it in and talk with a TaylorMade technician and see what the issue was.

We went through a series of swings and made a few adjustments, a higher launching, but stiffer flex shaft, higher loft head, and slid the weights on the Y Track to a more forgiving and draw-assisting setting. It was a world of difference. At that point, I was squaring up the ball and driving shots into the back net at the range once again. This is just another shining reason why proper fitting is important.


Team TaylorMade: PGA Tour players currently playing the M3 and M4 drivers. From left to right: Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy, Dustin Johnson, Jason Day, Jon Rahm, Justin Rose.

On both drivers, one of my issues was that the sweet spot felt like it set up quite a bit inside. The face blends into the toe and wraps around, which to me felt like it gave the driver a very open feel. Through multiple testings I accepted that my natural shot shape with the M4 is more of a fade, and when I set up expecting that shot, my results improved quite a bit. I like the sound of the Geocoustic sole more than the M3. All the carbon composite of the M3 changes the sound quite a bit, and the M4 has more of the traditional driver sound I am accustomed to hearing.

What I will say is this, while my personal testing did not produce the most consistent results, there is a ton to like about the new TaylorMade M3 and M4 drivers. The use of silver instead of white on the crown still contrasts beautifully with the carbon composite, and has a richer, more modern look than the white of the M1 and M2 drivers. I was able to see Twist Face technology work when I consciously tried to hit a ball out on the toe and off the heel and it did as advertised. My ball would come back towards the center, but wouldn’t snap hook or high slice. My recommendation is to go hit them all and let your hands and eyes tell you what is best for you.

The following two tabs change content below.

Keith Schneider

Web Content Manager at
Keith SchneiderAge: 34 Handicap: 4.9 Introduction to golf: Age 14 Playing years: 20 Rounds per year: 75+ Hole in Ones: 1WITB Driver: Titleist TS2 10.5° Project X HZRDUS Smoke 65 6.5 3 Wood: Cobra King F9 Fairway Wood 3-Wood Project X HZRDUS Smoke 75 6.5 2-Iron: Mizuno MP-18 MMC Fli-Hi KBS Tour C Taper Lite Stiff 1° weak 1.5° upright Irons: Mizuno MP-68 (4-PW) +1/2" Dynamic Gold X100 2° upright Wedge: Titleist Vokey SM7 51° 8° bounce Dynamic Gold S400 F Grind Wedge: Titleist Vokey SM7 Wedge Works 55° 14° bounce Dynamic Gold S400 F Grind Wedge: Titleist Vokey SM7 Wedge Works 60° 6° bounce Dynamic Gold S400 K Grind Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport 2 35" Balls: Titleist ProV1x, TaylorMade Tour Preferred X or Callaway Chrome Soft X

Leave A Reply